Well, hello there racism. Long Time, No See*

Another blond, blue-eyed child has been taken from a Roma family in order to “prove” whether or not the child has been kidnapped. This case is in Dublin and follows swiftly on the heels of a case in Greece where a blond, blue-eyed child was taken into care and the Roma couple who cared for charged with kidnapping. The similarities between both cases is obvious: it’s racism; systemic racism against the Roma people which has existed for hundreds of years. 

In the case in Greece, and ignoring the unbearable racism of some of the reporting, the couple have never claimed to be the child’s biological parents. Instead, they have been clear that they adopted the child, according to Roma customs, when the birth mother handed the child over to them. Whether or not this is true remains to be seen; unfortunately, it is highly unlikely that we will ever know the truth in this case as both the media and the Greek government have decided that the child *must* be a victim of kidnapping as there is no other reason that a white woman would hand a blond child over to non-white people. Jane Fae and RoseAnna Star have both blogged responses to the media reporting of this case, therefore I won’t go into more detail but just reinforce the issue of systemic racism in this case: would a brown-haired child adopted by a Roma family ever have been taken into care based on an assumption of kidnapping? Would the authorities, who found the child during a “raid”, even noticed that the child was adopted? If they could prove the child had been kidnapped, would there be national press about the case? The answer to all three is fairly obviously no.

The Dublin case has one major differentiation to the Greek case: the Dublin Roma family have publicly stated that they are the biological parents of the child. The reason the child was taken into custody: she is blond, blue-eyed and pale skinned. Her parents are not. Even I, who only passed grade 10 biology due to an extra credit for taking care of the class gerbils, knows that genetically it is perfectly possible for two parents with brown hair and brown eyes to produce a child who looks nothing like them. Hell, stand in a school playground and try to guess which kids belong to each parent. You may get a couple right away and you might be able to match siblings but it would be very difficult to match every single child to a biological parent.

The only reason anyone would doubt the parentage of a blue-eyed, blond haired Roma child is racism. The racism faced by Romas is constant and it has not decreased since the Nazis exterminated nearly 25% of Europe’s Roma population. Roma still face discrimination in housing, healthcare, employment and schooling. Myths of Roma’s as thieves and kidnappers never stop. 

Removing a child from the custody of their biological parents when there is no evidence of abuse and based entirely on skin colour is racism. 

It really is that simple.


*And just in case there are any misunderstandings: the title is meant sarcastically. 

UPDATE: The child has been returned to her parents in Dublin after DNA tests proved they were the child’s biological parent. According to the BBC article linked, a two year old had been removed from his Roma parents for the same reason in County Westmeath. 

The Irish government and the local police forces have some very serious questions to answer about institutional racism and their child protection policies. I hope both families sue.

Welcome to Rape Culture: Cee Lo Green Avoids Rape Charge by Drugging Victim

CeeLo Green has been charged with giving the drug ecstasy to woman without her consent in Los Angeles last July. He then took her back to her hotel room. 

I wrote gave her “the drug ecstasy without her consent”. The BBC wrote “slipped”. Let’s be clear here: the word slipped implies an accident. Deliberately putting a known rape-drug into a woman’s drink without her consent is not an “accident”. It’s a deliberate act of violence in and of itself.* It is also a deliberate act made in order to commit a second act of violence: rape.  

This is the entire article on the BBC website:

Singer and television star CeeLo Green has been charged with giving the drug ecstasy to a woman while the two were dining at a Los Angeles restaurant. 

Mr Green, real name Thomas DeCarlo Callaway, “slipped” the drug to the 33-year-old woman during the meal last July, prosecutors said. 

The two then went back to the woman’s hotel room, authorities said. 

If convicted, Mr Green, 38, faces up to four years in prison. He pleaded not guilty.
Mr Green was charged with one felony count of furnishing a controlled substance, the Los Angeles County District Attorney’s Office said. 

He pleaded not guilty during his arraignment in Los Angeles County court on Monday.
Prosecutors have requested his bail be set at $30,000 (£18,579). He is scheduled to appear in court again on 20 November. 

Mr Green, an Atlanta native who rose to prominence as a member of rap group Goodie Mob, later won fame as a solo artist. He also appears on the NBC reality show The Voice.

What isn’t mentioned: what Green did to the victim after they got back to her hotel room. The victim doesn’t remember because she was drugged to the point of amnesia. It neglects to mention that the prosecutors “declined” to pursue a rape charge because the woman was incapacitated. Even the Daily Mail managed to include that extremely important piece of information, although it was buried in a huge pile of rape myths. There is also no mention of Green’s well-documented history of violence against women. Green has convictions for domestic violence against his ex-wife who divorced him citing mental and physical cruelty. There is at least one other instance of sexual violence which was investigated. 


The Daily Mail article is full of the usual rape myths, many of which came from the police investigating the crime itself. The LAPD has a reputation for being a heteronormative, racist, homophobic, militarised and corrupt institution. It’s not surprising that rape victims don’t report when the police believe that male celebrities have the right to rape whoever they want without punishment.

This is just a brief snapshot of some of the myths in the DM which came from police sources: 
  1. The woman had been dating Green prior to the incident.
  2. The woman in question had a prior sexual relationship with Green.
These are two pernicious rape myths which are responsible for the fact that most rapists never face a criminal trial never mind conviction. The vast majority of rapes are perpetrated by men known to the victim; men who know that their “prior relationship” will be used as evidence that the woman must have consented. It is the reason that rape in marriage is still legal in numerous countries all over the world. Rape in marriage was only criminalised in 1991 in England and Wales [1982 in Scotland].

What the BBC neglected to mention is that Green’s own attorney admits that “sexual contact” took place. Blair Berk just claims it was “consensual”. This is yet another pernicious rape myth: if the woman was so incapacitated by ecstasy that she could not remember what happened, then she could not have consented. 

CeeLo was pleased that the rape charge was rejected and will address the ecstasy charge in court, his attorney Blair Berk wrote in a statement. 

She said any sexual contact between Green and the woman was consensual. 

‘Mr. Green encouraged a full and complete investigation of those claims and he was confident once conducted he would be cleared of having any wrongful intent,’ Berk wrote. She declined further comment.

The above was published in the Daily Mail. It reads as though Green’s attorney is admitting that rape took place but without “wrongful intent”. At what point did deliberately putting a rape-drug into a woman’s drink stop having “wrongful intent”? 

This is rape culture: where a male celebrity cannot be prosecuted for rape for drugging his victim in advance. Where deliberately placing a known rape-drug in a woman’s drink has no “wrongful intent”. Where a woman is in a perpetual state of consent to any man she meets, and no woman can ever revoke consent. Once you have said yes to a man, you can never say no again.


Below are a series of tweets on the case: 

Thank you to Victoria Brownworth for bringing this to my attention.

I’m disappointed in the New Statesman: They are better than Russell Brand

I get that this is one of those economic decisions because Russell Brand will bring in lots of readers and, when he’s not being a misogynistic arse, he is actually quite smart. But, Russell Brand is a misogynistic arse and the New Statesman are better than this.

TBF, this image amuses me but only because I think it’s an accurate reflection on what Brand thinks of himself [and I genuinely don’t care Richard Morris says, this is clearly Helen Lewis making a point about women’s role in society].


Rather than just complain about Brand being the guest editor, I thought it would be more productive to compile a list of guest editors who are way cooler than Russell Brand. Off the top of my head and in no particular order:

  1. Roseanne Barr
  2. Gloria Steinem
  3. Victoria Brownworth
  4. Karen Ingala Smith
  5. Bim Adewunmi
  6. Liz Kelly
  7. Caroline Criado-Perez
  8. Nimko Ali
  9. Bidisha
  10. Samira Ahmed
  11. Aminatta Forna
  12. Margaret Atwood
  13. Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie
  14. Writers of Colour
  15. End Misogyny Online
  16. Everyday Victim Blaming
  17. The Women’s Room UK

And, yeah, 3 of them aren’t actual people but it’s my list and I don’t care. 

Do add your own suggestions below. The New Statesman runs these issues a lot. Let’s make the next one involve someone with better ethics than Brand.

PETA: Stop Using Violence Against Women as Gimmick in your Advertising

My loathing of PETA is pretty well documented on this blog and at The Seething Cauldron. I always think they’ve mined the depths of human hypocrisy but they

always come back swinging; recently they crossed over into child sexual exploitation. PETA are not an organisation which helps raise awareness of animal cruelty; instead they reinforce a heteronormative, hypersexualised construction of women as object. They are about middle-aged, right-on white dudebros pretending they that are cool when really they are just creepy old men.


I fully support this petition demanding that PETA stop using images of violence against women as a gimmick in their advertising. 





This is the text of the petition: 

It is possible to highlight the issues of animal cruelty without degrading women. Exploiting the violence and abuse of women to highlight the abuse of animals enables abusive attitudes and behaviours – it is counter productive to your cause and makes a mockery of any message seeking tolerance and understanding. Highlighting one form of abuse by exploiting another shows a lack of understanding and complete disregard of the devastating impact violence against women has on our society. 

Violence against women is a worldwide epidemic – this is not a source for humour. Would PETA use child abuse to highlight animal cruelty? I think not – because, quite rightly, that would not be ethical – so I ask why does PETA think the use of domestic violence is acceptable? 

In the US 3 women a day are murdered by a current or former partner
In the UK 2 woman a week are murdered by a current or former partner
In Sth Africa a woman is killed every 6 hours by an intimate partner
In the US There is an average of 207,754 victims (age 12 or older) of rape and sexual assault each year 

UK Government statistics released in January 2013 estimated that: 

85,000 women are raped on average in England and Wales every year.
400,000 women are sexually assaulted annually
1 in 5 women (aged 16 – 59) has experienced some form of sexual violence since the age of 16.
28% of women who are victims of the most serious sexual offences never tell anyone about it. 

Please remove current campaigns and pledge to use ethical advertising campaigns that are considerate to ALL living creatures. 

PETA continually use images that depict women as pieces of meat and sex objects in their adverts. Images that are misogynistic, fat-shaming, sexually suggestive and anti-body hair. Most disturbingly they continue to use violence against women as a means of highlighting the plight of animals.

It would almost seem that PETA have a ‘policy’ to use violence against women as a means to an end to raise awareness of animal cruelty. See this truly disturbing and offensive campaign using ‘humour’ and domestic violence to promote becoming a vegan

Feminism in London Conference: You all need to go

Technically, the only Feminism in London Conference I have attended was the one in 2010 but it was brilliant: really, really brilliant. In fact, the only problem I had with it was that it wasn’t the same weekend as Reclaim the Night and I couldn’t afford to do both.

But, this year they’ve not only ensured that the Feminism in London Conference is the same day as Reclaim the Night, there will also be an event hosted by Stop Porn Culture the same day!

I honestly can’t recommend this conference enough [or the book stalls!] and Reclaim the Night is always an amazing safe space for women. I hope all the participants have an incredible time [and take copious notes to share with me!]

Morning panel keynote speakers
Caroline Lucas – Sexism in the Media 
Natalya Dell – Disability and Bi Visibility in Feminism
Shabina Begum – Acid Violence 
Morning programme
Panel
Incarcerated Women 
A panel discussion on women in prison, particularly relevant today in the wake of the Corston Report. Speakers include Jenny Earle of the Prison Reform Trust, Adeline Trude of Bail for Immigration Detainees, Rachel Helford of Women in Prison, and Bridget Rukwira chairing.
Workshops
No Choice At All
Raven Kaliana, an artist and human rights activist, presents a screening of her film Hooray for Hollywoodfollowed by a Q&A session. The film is a look at human trafficking and child exploitation.  Raven’s motivation to inspire social change stems from her history as a survivor of these crimes.  With Heather Harvey of Eaves.
Working Towards Non-Hierarchical Relationship Models 
You can’t choose who you fall in love with, we’re told, but are there alternatives to traditional relationship structures and sexualities? What would relationship structures look like in a feminist utopia? Explore the possibilities of love in the 21st century and beyond.  Presented by Dr Christine Campbell.
Feminist Opposition to Militarised Male Violence 
This workshop explores why militarism is a feminist issue and what we can do about it.  We will consider the role and consequences of armed male power on women’s lives, and discuss a range of feminist strategies and actions that can empower us to disarm patriarchy.  With Rebecca Johnson.
Challenging Linked Systems of Power: Towards a Whole-istic Feminism 
This session aims to transcend rifts between radical, liberal, socialist and other ‘kinds’ of feminism. Women are oppressed by male dominance but capitalism, white supremacy and other power relations do just as much damage. We join the dots between these systems of domination – in workplaces, public services, at school, at home – and ask how a ‘whole-istic’ feminism can resist them.  With Brigitte Lechner and Cynthia Cockburn.
Secularism and Feminism within BME Communities 
Gita Sahgal of the Centre for Secular Space and Lola Tinubu of African Atheists UK discuss the shared challenges and experiences of BME women engaged in secular feminism. 
MRA Workshop (Pro-Feminist Men’s workshop – all welcome) 
Men’s Rights Activists (MRAs) are a persistent presence in online forums and debates about feminism. This workshop looks at some typical MRA arguments and through group discussion seeks to arrive at effective responses to them. The workshop is open to all, but male allies seeking ways to support feminists online are especially welcome.  Presented by Chris Green of the White Ribbon Campaign and David Brooks of the Men’s Feminist Book Group. 
Children’s Morning Workshop: Girls in Stories
Creative storytelling for younger attendees, presented by Jean Norman.  
The workshop will look at different ways female characters have been portrayed over the last 50 years or so. We will look at similarities and differences, how and if the roles have changed and then invent our own characters, female or male, and write our own stories.   
Age 7 – 11 recommended.  Girls and boys welcome.
Teenage Morning Workshop:  What’s so good about being a woman?
As a teenage girl, what seems good to you about becoming a woman?  What doesn’t seem so appealing? What can we do to change that?
Are women today a good advert for growing up into one? Which women do you admire?  
What it’s like to be a teenage girl in 2013? What do teenagers know that would be good to share with the rest of the world?
Whether you have lots to say in answer to these questions, or whether you just want to listen to others’ points of view, this workshop is for you and we’d love you to join us. Ages 11 – 18 recommended, girls only.
**************************************************************************************************
Afternoon programme:
Panel
Women and the Media, A Post-Leveson World
What can we expect from the media in a post-Leveson world? The panel will include a speaker from Object, who made submissions to the Leveson enquiry about the portrayal of women in the media, Yasmin Alibhai-Brown who is a well known writer and journalist, and Ruth Barnes from The Other Woman radio show.  Chaired by Roweena Russell.
Workshops:

Sexual Violence And Trafficking: An International Perspective
Raggi Kotak, founder of the Anti-Trafficking Legal Project and Liberty Human Rights Award nominee, will co-ordinate a workshop on international VAW with Dr. Aisha Gill, Associate Professor in Criminology at the University of Roehampton. 
Vagina!
While awareness of Female Genital Mutilation (FGM) as a human rights abuse increases, labiaplasty in the west gains popularity amongst those who seek the “perfect” genitalia. What does patriarchy encourage us to do to our vulvas and vaginas across the globe? Meet Nimco Ali of Daughters of Eve, BBC reporter Najlaa Abou Mehri and consultant gynaecologist Michelle Fynes.
Kick-Ass Activism 
A How to of Campaigning… by Team No More Page 3!
Let Sarah, Angela, Jo, Laura and Stephanie stoke your activism fire and show you the ropes of campaigning! Warning: You might just start a campaign after this!
No More Page 3 is a campaign appealing to the editor of The Sun to please stop showing the Page 3 topless pictures. It has public backing from UK Girlguiding, National Union of Teachers, UNISON,  Rape Crisis and many other unions, charities and organisations, as well as the support of 140 cross party MPs and well over 115,000 petition signers. In August this year the Irish Sun stopped showing the topless Page 3 pictures.

Ageism and Experiences of Ageism
This workshop will discuss stereotyping in its many forms and ageism in particular, in society generally and as it affects the young, older and old women present.  We will consider old age as seen by younger women and experienced and lived by older women. This will be very much a participatory workshop, with useful academic material available for those who are interested.  Presented by Marj of the Older Feminist Network and Vito from the Older Lesbian Network.
Taking Space, Talking Loud (women only)
Join Rebecca of the Scary Little Girls theatre company for a workshop exploring what it means to take up space as a woman.  Frequently asked to reduce ourselves and blend into the background, this workshop will use discussion, some simple drama and Transactional Analysis exercises to explore how we women can find our selves and our voices to enjoy a place in the world, rather than play under it!  We will explore issues that affect women at work, socially and in relationships in a safe, women only space. All women welcome.
Workshop on Healthy Relationships (Pro-Feminist Men’s workshop – all welcome)
Working With Men (WWM) will introduce participants to our work which aims to prevent violence and gender inequality amongst young people.
WWM uses its uniqueness in engaging boys and young men to explore masculinity and relationships within the contexts of race, culture and class. WWM supports boys and young men to gain an objective perspective of violence, in turn empowering them to regain control over their lives, make informed decisions and express themselves clearly with girls and young women. With Owen Thomas and Sally Mehta.
Children’s Afternoon Workshop: T-shirt making
A hands-on workshop recommended for girls and boys aged 7 – 11, presented by Susy Langsdale.  This workshop will involve a discussion about gender stereotyping and then give everyone the chance to make their own feminist t-shirt!  T-shirts and pens will be provided so if your child wishes to attend this then they MUST indicate on the booking programme.  
Teenage Afternoon Workshop: Empowerment!
EMPOWER is part of the Safer London Foundation.  Our EMPOWER workshop takes a look at young women’s rights. We’ll be debating, celebrating and expressing ourselves, making banners and placards with positive images, words and slogans. Ready in time to take along to Reclaim the Night. Get creative and EMPOWER yourself! For young women aged 11-18. With Lucy, Laura, Aisha and Bex.
Afternoon panel keynote speakers
Gita Sahgal – Campaigning
Finn Mackay – closing speech

Other events!
Reclaim the Night – meet 6.30pm for a 7pm start

Amazon continues to promote Rape Culture. [content note].

Amazon’s complete refusal to take responsibility for the products is well-known. They are forever being caught selling products which glamourise violence against women and children so I shouldn’t have been surprised when a link to the e-book “Using her while she sleeps: Stretching my friends little sister” got tweeted into my timeline via Ending Victimisation and Blaming [Everyday Victim Blaming] and Graham. This is the blurb to the e-book:

Hunky college senior Trey has had a terrible night out. His roomie Matt has gone home with the girl that Trey had his eye on the whole night. 

Despondent, well-hung Trey goes home to jerk off alone, but when he gets there, he remembers that Matt’s 19 year old little sister Chelsea is crashing on their couch. 

Unable to stop himself, Trey starts to play with the passed out young teen, but he has a problem. She’s so petite, and his cock is so huge, he just can’t fit inside her. 

Will he be able to have his way with her without waking her up? 

Find out in this 4400 word erotic story, which features a horny guy with a huge manhood, a petite sleeping teen, oral sex, rough sex, and creampies. 

Strictly for adults only!

Another title by the same author is Gangbanged in her sleep.

This is rape. Selling products which promote rape is not acceptable. It’s precisely why victims of rape and sexual violence are either labelled liars or blamed for being victims: because shit like this is peddled by huge multinational corporations [and can be easily bought by children].

You can submit a complaint about products which promote rape here

#DickheadDetox : Gok Wan for being a patronising arsenugget


I’ll just be brutally honest here: I hate Gok Wan. He represents everything that is wrong with our culture and he’s made a fortune making women feel ashamed of their bodies whilst gaslighting them into believing he genuinely cares about their physical and emotional health. 

If he genuinely gave a shit about women, he wouldn’t be publicly humiliating them by telling them their bodies are hideous and then shoving them into spanx and high heels whilst grabbing at their breasts without permission.

Why he thought a webchat on Mumsnet was a good idea is beyond me. It was never going to go well. There is some sycophantic drivel posted on the thread. Wan obviously only chose to answer the drivel and ignore the difficult questions about how he reinforces patriarchal culture by forcing women to conform to the patriarchal fuckability test.

Gok Wan doesn’t give a shit about women. He’s in it for the money. 


Below are a selection of the questions that Wan refused to answer on the web chat. Notice the mini-tantrum Gok has when challenged on a question: 

International Day of the Girl: We Need to Celebrate the Brave Girls.

This is a short list of some of the brave girls making our world a better place: 

Eesha Khare (18): For inventing a device which can charge cellphones in less than 30 seconds

Ann Makosinski (15): For inventing a body-heat powered flashlight

Deepika Kurup (14): For inventing a solar-powered water purifier.


Duro-Aina Adebola (14), Akindele Abiola (14,) Faleke Oluwatoyin (14), and Bello Eniola (15) : For inventing a generator which is powered by urine.


Angela Zhang (17) : For inventing a cure for cancer which eliminated all tumours in mice. 


The Hippie Pands (11-14) : For inventing a way of pasteurising milk in places where traditional methods aren’t possible.

Catherine Wong (17): For inventing a portable electrical cardiogram.

Malala Yousafzai (16): For standing up to the Taliban in defence of education for girls [and who may or may not win the Nobel Prize for Peace today]

These are only a snapshot of some of the amazing girls;  many of whom will never get public recognition for their roll as carers, inventors, scientists, artists, dancers and survivors. 

We need to celebrate all the brave girls who stand for themselves and other girls in a culture who teaches us to hate our bodies and our minds. 

Today, I’m celebrating all our brave girls.

#DickheadDetox : Hugo Schwyzer for a career built on MVAW


I was lucky to have only come across Schwyzer in 2010 on Mumsnet. A group of (white) radical feminists were discussing his latest “incident” [and I don’t remember which one as Schwyzer has a lot of incidents]. I asked who he was and they gave me the litany of the violence he has perpetrated against women, including nearly killing a former partner, his continuing sexual predation on young women who were his students as well as overt racism.

Having read all the links posted, I just assumed all feminists thought that Schwyzer was a manipulative sociopath who was using feminism as a ruse to get access to more young women. 

I forgot what the “manipulative sociopath” bit meant. Schwyzer has succeeded for so long because women want to believe in the redemption narrative. We are trained from birth to believe that men have the ability to change through the “love of a good woman”. Lib Fems believed Schwyzer because he represents Third Wave “sex-positive” feminism. They believed him because they had too. 

Critiquing Schwyzer means actually analysing the problematic nature of identity politics and “sex positivism” which privileges the male orgasm above all else, including the physical and emotional harm done to women. It means actually analysing the systemic and structural consequences of the Patriarchy. Hell, it means acknowledging the Patriarchy exists. 

It’s very clear (for anyone who bothers to google) that radical feminists and WOC feminists/ womanists have been calling out Schwyzer for years. Jezebel and a disappointing number of mainstream feminist presses have allowed Schwyzer a platform for years. They have ignored his attacks on WoC and women who Schwyzer deemed as a “lower class” than him. 

Schwyzer is a manipulative sociopath who has abused women for years. But, he has had help in continuing to abuse women. Every single feminist magazine which gave him a platform helped. By accepting Schwyzer’s redemption narrative uncritically, many Third Wave feminists have simply reinforced patriarchal norms. 

Frankly, a man who lists himself as the head of a movement about women should always be treated with suspicion. And, any dude who brags about nearly killing a former partner should be placed in the dickhead pile. Not given a column in Jezebel. 

Schwyzer may be a manipulative sociopath but a lot of women say through his behaviour and for this, they were ridiculed, dismissed and ignored. Feminism isn’t about men. It’s about women. The destruction of the patriarchy will result in men being liberated from oppressive gender roles but our first concern must be women. 

Schwyzer has never stopped abusing women. Instead, too many chose to ignore the evidence of his abuse. Third Wave feminists did not believe women who stood up to Schwyzer. Believing women who speak out about their experience of male violence is a fundamental tenet of feminism. Anything else is patriarchal bullshit. 

Schwyzer belongs on the #dickheaddetox. But, those who supported him uncritically also need to do some reflection and, in a number of cases, apologise.

#DickheadDetox: Terry Richardson for being a Sexual Predator and all his supporters for colluding with him

Terry Richardson’s status as a sexual predator is well-known. Jezebel ran an article in 2010 detailing Richardson’s quite clear sexual harassment and assault of model Jamie Peck when she was only 19 years old:

When she [Peck] said she wanted to keep her underwear on because she was menstruating, Peck says Richardson asked her to take out her tampon so he could play with it, and make “tampon tea.” He insisted on being called “Uncle Terry,” and during their shoot, Richardson unexpectedly stripped naked.
“Before I could say ‘whoa, whoa, whoa!’ dude was wearing only his tattoos and waggling the biggest dick I’d ever seen dangerously close to my unclothed person (granted, I hadn’t seen very many yet).” In Peck’s words, Richardson eventually “maneuvered” her over to a couch in his studio, where he “strongly suggested I touch his terrifying penis.” When he ejaculated, one of his assistants gave Peck a towel.

 The Globe & MailJezebel and NYMag have all covered his predatory behaviour. His well-known quote “it’s not who you know, it’s who you blow” has been doing the rounds of the media for years. All of his images are of pornified bodies of young women who pass the patriarchal fuckability test. 

The comments in this article on Jezebel are very interesting: apparently, Richardson only takes photos of young, white models. I am not familiar enough with Richardson’s work to take a formal stance but a quick five minute google does suggest that most of the models in Richardson’s work are white. Is this Richardson’s personal preferences or a reflection of the systemic racism with the fashion industry which privileges an image of beauty that most women can never attain but that no WoC will ever manage? Either way, it is still racism.


Yet, Anna Wintour “loves” his work. He’s shot for pretty much every major fashion magazine and designer. He’s clearly a sexual predator and the fashion industry [and Hollywood] have colluded in his sexual harassment and assault of vulnerable young women for the entirety of his career. 


I hope that the fashion industry will take some responsibility for the very young women they have allowed to be abused and harassed by Richardson and stop using his work. At the very least, Barack Obama probably has enough clout to have someone who isn’t a sexual predator take his picture.

Oh, and whatever you do, don’t google images of Richardson without a filter. He takes a lot of photos of his penis.