Comedians are some of the best political commentators: a response to Helen Lewis


I’ve been rather open with my distaste at Russell Brand being invited to guest edit the New Statesman, and by distaste I mean horrified. It’s safe to say I have no respect whatsoever for Brand; a man who has “joke” called a rape crisis line during a show, phoned the grandparent of a woman to publicly and sexually shame his granddaughter live with Jonathon Ross and once sexually harassed a member of staff on his film set into displaying her breasts before he would do any work. None of these examples are of any comedic value. They are a clear pattern of misogynistic behaviour from a man who cares little about 50% of the population of the planet.

I objected to Russell Brand because of his behaviour, not because of his employment history. I objected because I like the New Statesman. They have some great women writers, including Sarah Ditum and Glosswitch. The New Statesman is one mainstream publication that I do read consistently and I objected to Brand because I do hold it to a higher standard than other media. Brand is the kind of commentator I expect on Sky News, not a magazine which has such a high standard of writing. The NS isn’t perfect and it does get stuff wrong; Brand being an obvious example.

This is why I was surprised to read Helen Lewis’s tumblr about the reaction to Brand as a guest-editor. It seems a rather lot of people objected to Brand because he’s a ‘comedian’. I have to say I find this utterly bizarre as an objection. Many of our great political commentators throughout history have used satire, irony and humour to make their point; even The Great Man himself: Shakespeare.* The entirety of the comedy panel shows produced in the UK are based on comedians making political points. And, you know: the Daily Show with John Stewart, This Hour has 22 Minutes and the Royal Canadian AirFarce: all of which are comedians fronting programs about politics.

Chris Rock is a comedian and a great political commentator. His tweets leading up to the last American election were fucking brilliant and, whilst I am unamused by his comments on the Kardashian sisters which are clearly based on sexism, he is far more qualified than Brand to guest edit the NS.  

There are so many great women comedians who are equally important political commentators: Roseanne Barr, Kate Smurthwaite and Ruby Wax spring to mind. 

I’m all for Brand being accidentally misplaced on another planet because of his behaviour. I am, however, equally bored of people dismissing ‘comedians’ as political commentators as if they only people who are entitled to have opinions are Oxbridge educated white dudes with trust funds.

Comedians have always made some of the  best political commentators. We just need to support the ones who do so without being misogynists like Brand [or racist, homophobic, disablist, classist etc.]

I would love to see the New Statesman guest-edited by some of the brilliant women comedians based in the UK; after all a number of their best writers use humour to make political points and how is that any different to a stand-up comedian using humour to make a political point? 

Same message; just a different medium.



*Actually, I find the obsession with Shakespeare being the greatest writer who ever lived classist, sexist and evidence of some serious issues with imperialism and racism.

5 thoughts on “Comedians are some of the best political commentators: a response to Helen Lewis”

  1. Soooo right about Shakespeare sister. It’s just old white male dude crap which should have been forgotten decades ago. The sooner he’s removed from the school curriculum and replaced with strong female writers the better. He’s only taught as a way of subtly of re-enforcing patriarchal values.

    1. But he’s not a good writer. That’s just the patriarchy talking. If you read any of the drivel he writes critically through a feminist eye it’s obvious that he just drones on and on about how great men are and how women are subject to men’s needs and desires. It’s simply appalling that this old sexist white dude is held up as an example of a genius to children, Really he should just be banned as reading him simply re-enforces the patriarchy.

      I’ve been thinking a lot about this recently and I believe that all books written by male authors should be banned in schools for children under 16. There’s not one taught that doesn’t glorify capitalist patriarchal values and subtly deliver the message that women are chattel. Post 16 a selected few male authored books could be introduced to show how men systematically oppress women, but only when children have developed the necessary critical framework to understand what they are reading without being contaminated by it.

    2. oh, I’m not denying he’s a patriarchal asshat because he clearly is. I do think he’s clever and a good writer but so is Gabriel Garcia Marquez and he writes about child rape as “romantic”.

      I’m with you on the banning on male writers. Can you imagine the hysterical screaming from the Menz if we tried to do that! 😀

    3. Really pleased you agree on male writers being banned for children. Of course the Menz would scream, but really how else can patriarchal drivel be stopped from contaminating young minds? There’s not a single male writer who doesn’t reinforce the patriarchy in some way.

      Apart from the Menz I think they’d be a fair few women who would complain too, but it would at least flush out the handmaidens.

      Maybe campaigning to have the older more obviously patriarchal male authors removed from children’s libraries would be a way forward do you think?

Leave a Reply